Syncterm, there could be a hot key for the qwk reader.^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Syncterm, there could be a hot key for the qwk reader.^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No ... mtelnet or Netrunner. I CANNOT stand Syncterm.
Exodus wrote to Matthew Munson <=-
Syncterm, there could be a hot key for the qwk reader.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No ... mtelnet or Netrunner. I CANNOT stand Syncterm.
Exodus wrote to Matthew Munson <=-
Syncterm, there could be a hot key for the qwk reader. Ex>^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No ... mtelnet or Netrunner. I CANNOT stand Syncterm.Why?
your system. And if not written to drive C, then where should they be
written? From what I recally, SyncTerm normally writes its settings to a common behavior in Windows; and in general, using a subdirectory of your us account directory seems to be fairly common for operating systems these day Windows normally stores its user account directories on the C drive, and I' not sure I see what's wrong with that.
No ... mtelnet or Netrunner. I CANNOT stand Syncterm.Why?
It has a HORRIBLE interface, and it's not easy to add/remove boards like it is in mTel or NetRunner. Default options do NOT stay and are written to drive C which NOTHING should be written to just to name a few.
I don't want shit screwing with the OS by someone that fat fingered some reg edit and boom, time to reinstall an OS. I'm not into that shit anymore. :)
I have not used Drive C since 1993 for anything other than the OS. That drive is ALWAYS clear. Anything goes on Drive D or E.
I don't feel it should be an account program for a BBS ... it should be able to be deleted byh removing the directory. It's a telnet app, not a huge program that needs "installed" into the OS. Everything is uses should be in the directory it unzips/runs from.
| Sysop: | Heisenberg |
|---|---|
| Location: | Kalgoorlie, Western Australia |
| Users: | 12 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 23:04:52 |
| Calls: | 67 |
| Files: | 1 |
| D/L today: |
1 files (527K bytes) |
| Messages: | 21,029 |